This month, BBC2's Victoria Derbyshire show focused on the effects of breakdown on children. Our own Sir Paul Coleridge was invited to interview several families - parents and children - who had experienced family breakdown.
The programme is a great watch, not least because of Paul's gentle interview manner but also because of the way, again and again, he brings us back to the data.
Watch it here - it's the first and last fifteen minutes of the programme.
Family breakdown is such an emotive topic because, as Paul says, 'everybody has a view on it because everybody nowadays has experience of family breakdown'.
The result tends to be that people express their concern about family breakdown but then shrug their shoulders as if it is inevitable and nothing can be done.
Two of the contributors to the programme say of their respective divorces 'I'm glad it happened' and 'we just decided we needed to be kind to each other' so that the children wouldn't suffer. In other words, it wasn't good but everybody is better off now.
On the flip side, one of the divorced couples also acknowledge that their daughters 'were used on both sides'. Their daughter then reluctantly admits that 'I still do have a little wish' that her parents were still together. Other contributors talk of still having 'nightmares after my parents divorce' years later and how a stand-off with an ex-partner now means 'I dread my children's future weddings'.
So, who to believe in this emotive subject?
'Anecdotes are fascinating,' says Paul. 'But let's concentrate on the data. Family breakdown has a devastating effect on children."
We have to be compassionate about this subject. But when the data shows that half of our teenagers have experienced family breakdown, that picking up the pieces costs the taxpayer £48 billion and rising, and when children's life chances then become stacked against, we need to treat this subject as a serious public health issue.
Here are just a few examples of how lone parents and their children are disadvantaged compared to equivalent couple parent families, based on data from the UK Families and Children's Survey (pdf download):
- 7 times as likely to be in the lowest fifth income group (47% vs 7%)
- 7 times as likely to be on housing benefit (42% vs 6%)
- twice as likely to have children whose health is not good (4% vs 2%)
- twice as likely to have their own health problems (13% vs 7%)
- twice as likely to have children with behaviour problems (16% vs 8%)
Families will always want to downplay their own experience of family breakdown. And in some cases, that will be justified. But when it affects half of our children, how can that possibly be the case for all, or even most?
We need to keep concentrating on the data.
I hope our work encourages you. Don't forget our Key Facts pages are there to help.
May your own marriage and those around you flourish!
Harry Benson, Marriage Foundation
|
|
If there was ever any doubt, our new study based on the best new UK data dispels it.
Continue reading →
|
|
|
It's twenty years ago that Kate invited me to a meeting about our marriage ... my most read blog
Continue reading →
|
|
|
|
|
|
As well as Paul's starring role on TV, we put out a couple of fun pieces this month, both of which also have their serious message.
The first piece - a short report - drew on the model I use for working out divorce rates. It's based on data from Office for National Statistics and looks at what happens to married couples who get married in any given year.
The Sunday Times asked us to put together a table on the odds of couples staying together, depending on how long they'd been married.
If you download the report, you can check out your own odds!
They start at 1 in 2.6 for couples just married, dropping to 1 in 4 for those married for ten years, 1 in 8 after twenty years, 1 in 25 after thirty years, 1 in 148 after forty years and 1 in 1,479 after fifty years.
Then we finished the month with an article I wrote for our own Modern marriage blog and also for Huffington Post on why it's not a great idea for a woman to propose on leap day - 29th February.
This is no unfortunate relic of patriarchy that is best consigned to the bin of history. It's a tradition that gently reminds of our human nature, namely that men's commitment is particularly dependent on buying in for themselves.
The number one thing I ask my own daughters about boyfriends is "does he fight for you?" This is because if he just 'slides' into the relationship rather than 'decides', then he's probably not that committed and it's likely to end in tears.
So should a woman propose on leap day?
Only if she is 100% sure that he's really committed and not just going along for the ride.
The Marriage Foundation is a registered charity.
No 1150453
(If you'd like to support our work, you can make a one-off donation online or a regular donation by contacting our office)
|
|
Marriage Foundation in the news
The month started with a bit of fun and our model for predicting your odds of divorce, depending on when you got married, It was covered initially by the Sunday Times, and followed by the Sun, Star, Mail, and Telegraph
Paul appearance in BBC2's Victoria Derbyshire programme prompted follow up in the Sun and Mail.
We also had mentions in Glamour magazine, the Mail, and my piece on leap day weddings for Huffington Post
Since our launch in May 2012, we have appeared on BBC News, BBC Newsnight, Channel 4 and 5 News, ITV This Morning, BBC Radio 4 Today programme and You & Yours, BBC Radio 2 Jeremy Vine, and many other stations.
Most of our newspaper coverage in the major national newspapers can be found here.
|
|
|
|
|