Coffin Corner

Patterson Outreach offers relationship enhancement classes for young couples and couples looking to strengthen their relationships. Couples are taught skills that will improve communication, increase their ability to solve problems, as well as confront financial issues. Patterson Outreach will use the Love’s Cradle Relationship Enhancement curriculum to provide proven techniques in areas of building strong families.

 

 

 

Objective

Participants will learn to:

o Show understanding towards their partner’s thoughts, feelings and concerns.

o Develop positive and effective expression skills.

o Engage in new ways to discuss pertinent issues.

o Find solutions that are beneficial to both partners.

o Use coaching skills to assist one another in needed making changes.

o Put skills into practice in order to build, strengthen and maintain lasting relationships

 

 

 

Learning Methods

Participants will learn through verbal instruction, live and video demonstrations, practices, as well as being coached. Couples are encouraged to be open to participate in group discussions, give feedback, and share thoughts and feelings on issues of their own choosing.

Patterson Outreach Relationship Enhancement

The Love’s Cradle curriculum is a 6 week program consisting of two, 2 hour classes per week.

I remember saying, “I, Patty, take you, Marcus, to be my husband, to have and to hold from this day forward, for better or for worse, for richer, for poorer, in sickness and in health, to love and to cherish, from this day forward until death do us part.”

I didn’t know it then, but recently I learned that my wedding vows were missing something. I promised to love my husband, but didn’t mention anything about respect. When I heard that a man’s greatest need is respect, it was an “aha” moment.

Of course, respecting someone has a lot of the same rules as loving someone.

Committing to love someone means loving him no matter what. It means treating him with love whether I feel like it or not. It means treating him with love whether I think he deserves it or not.

The same holds true with respect. When I promise to respect someone, I should treat him with respect even if he’s not acting respectable. I should treat him with respect regardless of how I feel.

Easier said than done!

But both love and respect need to be unconditional and intentional. We need to make a choice to love and respect and do our best to follow through.

When we’re on the receiving end of unhoped-for behavior, we need to remember to look at the intent and offer grace when needed. Looking at their hearts, offering them the benefit of the doubt when appropriate, and keeping realistic expectations helps.

When a wife doesn’t feel loved, she still needs to respect her husband. And when a husband doesn’t feel respected, he still needs to love his wife. Otherwise, it’s a Catch 22 with a downward spiral. None of us wants that.

It’s easy to forget that how we treat others is more about us than it is about them. But isn’t that what we try to teach our children when we tell them not to blame someone else for their behavior?

This concept of love and respect is obvious when you look at healthy, long-lasting marriage relationships like my grandparents’ that persevered over 60 years.

Now that I know about my husband’s need for respect, I’m going to learn more about how to respect him and be more intentional about showing him respect. I want to follow in my grandparents’ footprints and enjoy a marriage that lasts a lifetime. How about you?

Hearts at Home is a Christ-centered organization designed to encourage, educate and equip moms. Hearts at Home, 1509 N. Clinton Blvd., Bloomington, IL 61701-1813; (309) 828-MOMS; www.hearts-at-home.org. Contact them at heartsnewspaper@hearts-at-home.org.

Even when people are sure of their love, the decision to enter into marriage is always a gamble — as is clear from the commonly quoted statistic that 50% of marriages end in divorce. An important question that naturally arises from this number is what are those who remain happy together doing right?

All marriages have their ups and downs; all people have their strengths and weaknesses; and all couples have areas of disagreement. But those who remain happy manage to view their relationship through a positive lens. They see the parts of their marriage that are most positive as the parts that are essential. However, most importantly, they are flexible about this. As the positive and negative aspects of their relationship shift with time, so does their judgment about what is essential — but they always focus on the most positive aspects in the moment.

Along with this positive perspective, they view their spouse’s problems, imperfections, or annoying habits in a way that neutralizes their impact. One approach they use is viewing these things in a benevolent way. For instance, a wife might understand her husband’s snapping as the result of a hard day instead of thinking of him as just being disrespectful. Such positive attributions help relationships to remain stable and supportive.

Another way partners remain happy together is by being aware of — and acknowledging — positives while allowing themselves to get upset about specific problems. In contrast, spouses who tend to be more blaming and less understanding create a negative environment at home.  For them, specific problems appear bigger and tend to snowball. It’s amazing how a toilet seat left in the upright position can ruin a couple’s whole day together!

Some people are inherently better at seeing the positive side of situations and understanding others from a more compassionate perspective. And they will certainly be happier for it. But for the rest of us, this is a skill that can be learned — when people are interested in developing it. For instance, couples can practice sharing what makes them feel loved and then practice doing those things.

Unfortunately, life sometimes makes it hard to be positive. We all have only a limited amount of time and energy. So when problems pile up (such as job stress, deaths of loved ones, illnesses, problems related to children), people’s inner resources become strained. Even the most charitable people can reach their limit, making it difficult to approach their marriage in positive ways. Because of this, it’s important for couples to nurture their relationship during the good times. This way they have more positive feelings to rely upon when life gets tough.

In the end, maintaining a happy marriage is, to a large extent, about how couples approach each other. The more they can see their marriage in a positive light and can be supportive and understanding of each other, the more successful their marriage will be.

If you would like to join a general discussion about this topic, visit the Relationships and Coping Community.

By LAURA LANDRO

What can 1,500 Americans born a century ago, most of them long dead, tell us about the secret to a long life? Plenty, according to Howard S. Friedman and Leslie R. Martin, two psychologists who, in "The Longevity Project," mine an eight-decade research effort for answers to the kinds of questions that sent Ponce de León searching for the Fountain of Youth.

There are no magic potions on offer here, but many of the findings are provocative. The best childhood predictor of longevity, it turns out, is a quality best defined as conscientiousness: "the often complex pattern of persistence, prudence, hard work, close involvement with friends and communities" that produces a well-organized person who is "somewhat obsessive and not at all carefree."

The study was initiated in 1921 by Stanford University psychologist Lewis Terman, who asked San Francisco teachers to pick out their brightest students—most were about 10 years old—to help him try to identify early glimmers of high potential. Terman was most interested in intellectual achievement (his revision of Alfred Binet's intelligence scale produced the Stanford-Binet IQ test), but his interviews were so detailed that the results could be used as a basis for studying the respondents' lives in follow-up interviews across the years. Terman himself died in 1956, just shy of 80; after his death his work was picked up by others, with Mr. Friedman and Ms. Martin launching their portion of the project in 1990.

The study's participants, dubbed Terman's Termites, were bright students, but having a high IQ didn't seem to play a direct role in longevity. Neither did going on to an advanced degree. The authors suggest that persistence and the ability to navigate life's challenges were better predictors of longevity.

Some of the findings in "The Longevity Project" are surprising, others are troubling. Cheerful children, alas, turned out to be shorter-lived than their more sober classmates. The early death of a parent had no measurable effect on children's life spans or mortality risk, but the long-term health effects of broken families were often devastating. Parental divorce during childhood emerged as the single strongest predictor of early death in adulthood. The grown children of divorced parents died almost five years earlier, on average, than children from intact families. The causes of death ranged from accidents and violence to cancer, heart attack and stroke. Parental break-ups remain, the authors say, among the most traumatic and harmful events for children.

View Full Image

The Longevity Project

By Howard S. Friedman and Leslie R. Martin
(Hudson Street Press, 248 pages, $25.95)

"The Longevity Project" is short on actual statistics, asserting instead broad trends among its study subjects and leaving readers to search through footnotes and then track down published studies if they want to learn more. With its relatively small sample and retrospective design, it hardly reaches the level of large population-based scientific investigations like the Framingham Heart Study, which followed thousands of participants for decades to identify common factors that contribute to cardiovascular disease, or the Women's Health Study, a 10-year randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of nearly 40,000 women age 45 and older.

Mr. Friedman and Ms. Martin do claim to have used accepted scientific-validation methods to confirm that their findings can be extrapolated for a general understanding of health and longevity. But their results are based mostly on sifting participants' self-reported data, with death certificates providing the only verifiable information: age and cause of death. Data on factors like genetic predisposition to disease weren't gathered.

Moreover, the study's subjects lived most of their lives in a dramatically different time, before AIDS threatened longevity and before medical advances such as angioplasty and the development of cholesterol drugs came along to improve life-span. The respondents were almost uniformly white children from middle-class families, so the results don't tell us much about the longevity of other groups. And many of the girl students did not go on to have careers, so "The Longevity Project" focuses on men when it discusses workplace matters and their role in long-term health.

The book offers quizzes so that readers can assess various qualities—such as sociability, neuroticism and the tendency to "catastrophize"—and compare the results with those of Terman's Termites. The respondents to the study who fared best in the longevity sweepstakes tended to have a fairly high level of physical activity, a habit of giving back to the community, a thriving and long-running career, and a healthy marriage and family life. They summoned resilience against reverses and challenges— including divorce, loss of a spouse, career upsets and war trauma. By contrast, those with the darkest dispositions—catastrophizers, who viewed every stumble as a calamity—were most likely to die sooner. (The book doesn't say by what margin; a study published in 1998 reported that men in the Terman group were 25% more likely to die by age 65 if they were catastrophizers.)

And what about those cheerful, relatively doomed kids? The authors tell us that, later in life, such children would be more likely than their peers to throw caution to the wind when it came to life-shortening habits like smoking, drinking and driving fast cars. The chipper types were also more likely to die from homicide, suicide or accident. Of course, the authors don't suggest telling happy kids to wipe the grins off their faces, but Mr. Friedman and Ms. Martin do make a case for instilling values such as forethought and purposefulness. Indeed, "The Longevity Project" is not just an exercise in numbers-crunching; its larger aim seems to be to improve public health by encouraging a society with more goal-oriented and conscientious citizens. Now that's a long-term project.

Ms. Landro writes The Informed Patient column for the Journal.